by Chris Woodford. Last updated: January 1, 2023.
Acentury or so ago, the number of cars
on Earth numbered in the thousands. Today, there are something like a billion cars—roughly one for every seven people on the planet, and the number's expected
to hit 2 billion by 2040. Think of Earth as a giant gas station
with only a limited supply of fuel and you'll realize quite quickly
that we have a problem. Many geologists think we're reaching a point
they call "peak oil" and, in the next few decades, supplies of gasoline
(and everything else made from petroleum) will start to dwindle. If
that happens, where will all our cars get their fuel from?
The short-term fix is to get better fuel efficiency
from existing cars. In the longer term, the solution
may be to switch vehicles over from gasoline engines and diesel to battery electricity and
electric fuel cells, which are a bit like batteries powered by hydrogen
gas that never run flat. Silent and—theoretically—pollution free, they're among the
cleanest and greenest power sources yet developed.
Are they all they're promised to be? Let's take a closer look at how they work!
Photo: Ford Motor Company's hydrogen fuel cell demonstration car (a modified Ford Focus).
Photo by courtesy of NASA Kennedy Space Center (NASA-KSC).
What are fuel cells?
There are really just two ways to power a modern car. Most cars on
the road today use an internal-combustion engine
to burn petroleum-based fuel, generate heat, and push pistons up and
down to drive the transmission and the wheels. Electric
cars work an entirely different way. Instead of an engine, they
rely on batteries that feed electric power to
electric motors that drive the wheels directly. Hybrid cars have both
internal-combustion engines and electric
motors and switch between the two to suit the driving conditions.
Fuel cells are a bit like a cross between an internal-combustion
engine and battery power. Like an internal-combustion engine, they make
power by using fuel from a tank (though the fuel is pressurized
hydrogen gas rather than gasoline or diesel). But, unlike an engine, a
fuel cell doesn't burn the hydrogen. Instead, it's fused
chemically with oxygen from the air to make water. In the process,
which resembles what happens in a battery, electricity is released and
this is used to power an electric motor (or motors) that can drive a
vehicle. The only waste product is the water—and that's so pure you can
Think of fuel cells as batteries that never run flat. Instead of
slowly depleting the chemicals inside them (as normal batteries do),
fuel cells run on a steady supply of hydrogen and keep making
electricity for as long as there's fuel in the tank.
Photo: Fuel in the tank—in the trunk of Ford's hydrogen fuel cell car.
Photo courtesy of NASA Kennedy Space Center.
Fuel cell stacks
A single fuel cell produces only about as much electricity as a
single dry-cell battery—nowhere near enough to power a laptop computer,
let alone a car. That's why fuel cells designed for vehicles use stacks
of fuel cells linked together in a series. The total electricity they
produce is equal to the number of cells multiplied by the power each
Types of fuel cell
PEM fuel cells (sometimes called PEMFCs)
favored by engineers for powering vehicles, but they're by no means the
only design possible. Just as there are many kinds of batteries, each
using different chemical reactions, so there are many kinds of fuel
cell too. Spacecraft use a more primitive design called an alkaline
fuel cell (AFC), while much greater amounts of power could be
generated by an alternative design known as a solid-oxide
(SOFC). Microbial fuel cells have an extra
feature: they use a
tank of bacteria to digest sugar, organic matter, or some other fuel
and produce either an electric current (which can be used to power a
motor) or hydrogen (which can power a fuel cell in the usual way).
Another possibility is to have a vehicle with a solar panel on the roof that uses the Sun's electricity to split water into hydrogen and oxygen gases with
an electrolyzer (see box below). These gases are then recombined in the fuel cell to produce electricity. (The advantage of doing things that way, rather than using the Sun's energy directly, is that you can store up
hydrogen in the daytime when the Sun's shining and then use it to drive
the fuel cell at night.)
Photo: Here's what a fuel cell actually looks like. This is a typical proton exchange membrane (PEM) hydrogen fuel-cell that can produce 5 kilowatts (5000 watts) of power. Photo by Warren Gretz courtesy of US Department of Energy/National
Renewable Energy Laboratory (DOE/NREL).
Where will all the hydrogen come from?
For the last 150 years or so, virtually every car has
run on a liquid we rather confusingly call gas. But in the next 150
years, many people think cars will run on a real gas:
hydrogen. In theory, running cars off hydrogen is a great idea: it's the simplest
and most common chemical element and it makes up the vast majority
(something like three quarters) of the entire matter in the Universe.
Plenty for everyone, then! But there's a snag: poke about in the air
around you and you won't find much hydrogen at all—only about one
liter of hydrogen in every million liters of air. (In volume terms,
that's the same as hunting down about two liters of water randomly
mixed up in every Olympic swimming pool full). So where will all the vast clouds of hydrogen come from to run our global car fleet?
We'll need to make it ourselves from water, the magic substance that covers 70 percent of Earth's surface, is made partly from hydrogen.
Split good old H2O into its parts and you get H2 (hydrogen) and O2 (oxygen). How do you do it? With an electrolyzer!
Why are fuel cells taking so long to catch on?
"For decades, hydrogen has been the Dracula of automotive fuels: Just when you think a stake has been driven through its zero-emissions heart, the technology rises from the grave."
The New York Times, April 2015.
People have been heralding fuel cells as the next big thing in power
supplies since the 1960s, when the Apollo space
demonstrated that the technology was practical. Four decades later,
there are hardly any fuel-cell cars on our streets—for a variety of
reasons. First, the world is geared up to producing gasoline engines by
the million, so they're naturally much cheaper, better tested, and more
reliable. You can buy an ordinary car for a few thousand
dollars/pounds but, until recently, a fuel-cell car would have set you back hundreds of
thousands. (Toyota's "relatively affordable" Mirai finally became widely available in 2016
at a cost of just under US$60,000, twice the price of its hybrid Prius.
That's partly why some fuel cell cars are available only on lease
arrangements. At the time I'm updating this article, in early 2023, a Honda Clarity Fuel Cell car can be leased for a relatively modest $379 per month.)
Cost isn't the only problem. There's also a massive
oil-based economy to support gasoline engines: there are garages
everywhere that can service gasoline-powered cars and filling stations
all over the place to supply them with fuel. By contrast, hardly anyone
knows anything about fuel-cell cars and there are virtually no filling
stations supplying pressurized hydrogen. The "hydrogen economy" is a far-off dream.
Photo: It could be a while before hydrogen filling pumps like this become commonplace.
Photo by courtesy of NASA Glenn Research Center.
It's easy to see how a world full of hydrogen cars might work.
We'd have lots of electrolyzer factories all over the place making
hydrogen gas from water. Now gases take up a vast amount more
space than liquids or solids, so we'd need to turn the hydrogen
gas into liquid hydrogen, making it easier to transport and store,
by compressing it to a high pressure. Then we'd transport the hydrogen to gas stations ("hydrogen stations"?)
where people could pump it into their cars, which would be powered by fuel cells instead of conventional gasoline engines.
Photo: Fuel cells aren't just for cars. This tractor is powered
by one. Photo by Keith Wipke courtesy of US Department of Energy/National Renewable Energy Laboratory (DOE/NREL) (NREL photo id#33995).
The trouble with hydrogen
But do you see the problem? Producing hydrogen by electrolysis uses energy—and quite a lot of it: we have to use electricity to split up water.
If we use typical solar cells to provide that electricity, they might be about 10 percent efficient, while an electrolyzer might be 75 percent efficient, giving a miserable overall efficiency of just
7.5 percent. That's quite a poor start—and it's only the start!
We also use energy transporting hydrogen and compressing it (turning hydrogen gas into a liquid) so cars can carry enough of it in their tanks to go anywhere. That's a real problem because the energy density of
hydrogen (the amount of energy it carries per unit of its volume or mass) is
only about a fifth that of gasoline. In other words, you need five times more to go as far
(assuming your hydrogen car is heavy as your gasoline one, which may not be the case—because gasoline cars need heavy engines and transmissions). Another problem is that hydrogen
is difficult to store for long periods because its extremely
tiny molecules easily leak out of most containers—and since
hydrogen is flammable, leaks can cause horrific explosions.
And then, of course, there are all the inefficiencies at the opposite end of the process, when a fuel-cell
car turns hydrogen back into electricity to power the electric motors that drive its wheels.
Hydrogen isn't a fuel
"...hydrogen is a hyped-up bandwagon... Hydrogen is not a miraculous source of energy; it's just an
energy carrier, like a rechargeable battery. And it is a rather inefficient energy
carrier, with a whole bunch of practical defects."
Professor David MacKay
Sustainable Energy Without the Hot Air
Hydrogen is not, itself a fuel, but simply a way of transporting fuel made by some other process.
So it's better to compare it to batteries (another way of packaging and transporting energy)
than to gasoline (a genuine fuel). All told, today's hydrogen cars are considerably less efficient than the best electric cars running off batteries and often less efficient than ordinary gasoline or diesel engine vehicles!
At the moment, the world has relatively little hydrogen for fuelling cars,
and virtually all of it (about 95 percent) is made from fossil fuels in an environmentally unfriendly way, so it can hardly be described as "green."
According to the International Energy Agency: "Demand for hydrogen, which has grown more than threefold since 1975, continues to rise—almost entirely supplied from fossil fuels, with 6% of global natural gas and 2% of global coal going to hydrogen production."
There's lots of ongoing research to change that—and there are
many ways of making hydrogen from water.
We could, for example, use solar cells to do the electrolysis of water "for free," but we could just as easily store the same energy in batteries and use those to power our cars instead. Fuel-cell cars sound promising, but if battery cars really are better, hydrogen may turn out to be an expensive distraction from the important business of switching the world from fossil fuels to renewable energy.
All these problems, summed up, explain why battery-car advocates like Tesla's Elon Musk like to deride hydrogen cars as "fool-cell vehicles" that are "mind-bogglingly stupid."
But hydrogen also has its plus points!
So why are people still pursuing fuel cells? Because, their supporters claim, they have numerous advantages over other electric-power technologies. Where charging up a battery-powered car can take anything from half an hour to a whole night, you can refuel a hydrogen car in just five minutes—as quickly as you can fill the gas tank of an ordinary car. The driving range of battery-powered cars has also been a point of contention. Current models now claim they can drive hundreds of kilometers or miles between charges, but not all of them manage that; it depends how much power you use for other things while driving; and range suffers as your battery gets older. Fuel-cell cars, by contrast, get much the same range as ordinary gas vehicles, although their performance does degrade as they age. Where battery technologies arguably work best in small cars, fuel-cells are equally good for larger vehicles and trucks.
Indeed, Ballard, one of the leading fuel-cell manufacturers, argue that fuel cells will soon be the most viable solution for heavy vehicles such as trucks, buses,
trains, and even planes that would otherwise be powered by dirty fossil fuels.
In California, there's now a huge push to make hydrogen more popular.
Anything but oil?
In summary, until automakers stop producing gas and diesel engines,
motorists will have little or no incentive to switch to fuel-cell cars.
Even then, because rival battery-electric and hybrid technologies
have a huge head start, fuel-cell cars may never catch on.
Most of us will stick with internal combustion engines for the time being,
though the announcement by large automakers that electric cars are the future is going to force us to change our ways some time in the next decade
or so. Will we see a straight switch to electric cars with onboard batteries
you charge up at home? Or perhaps a more gentle transition via hybrid cars, running gasoline engines
and electric motors, which will extend world oil supplies long enough for us
to come up with an entirely new technology—maybe even
No-one knows what the future holds, but one thing is certain: petroleum
will be playing a much smaller part in it. The sooner we embrace
alternatives—battery-electric cars, biofuels, fuel cells, or whatever—the better.