by Chris Woodford. Last updated: September 30, 2016.
Stop... start... stop... start. If you make a habit of driving in city
traffic, you'll know it can be a huge waste of time. What's less obvious is that it's
also a waste of energy. Getting a car moving needs a big
input of power, and every time you hit the brakes all the
energy you've built up disappears again, wasted in the brake pads as
heat. Wouldn't it be good if you could store this energy somehow and reuse it
next time you started to accelerate? That's the basic concept of
regenerative ("regen") brakes, which are widely used in electric
trains and the latest electric cars. What are they?
How do they work? Let's take a closer look!
Photo: This cutting-edge Tesla Roadster electric car uses regenerative braking to
save energy and go further on each power charge. Photo by courtesy of Steve Jurvetson, published on Flickr in 2007 under a
Creative Commons licence.
Why does braking waste energy?
If you get about town on a bicycle, it's
very obvious that braking is a huge waste of
energy. You have to pedal to get yourself going, and each time you
brake and come to a standstill you waste all the momentum you've
gained. Next time you want to move off, you have to start from scratch all over again. Put your
hands anywhere near the brake pads on a bicycle and you'll know
exactly where the energy goes: each time you brake and the rubber
pads clamp on the wheel, friction between
rubber and metal converts the energy you had when you were moving into
heat, which disappears uselessly into the air, never to be seen again.
(WARNING: Be very careful if you try this because brakes can get really hot!)
Car drivers are pretty much oblivious to the energy that braking wastes
because driving doesn't require any real, physical effort. Not only
that, but car brakes are hidden out of sight, inside the wheels, where you can't see the
heat energy they're wasting. But the heat they generate is extraordinary: the
brakes in formula-1 race cars, for example, often heat up to well
over 500°C (1000°F)!
Photo: Bye bye speed. Bicycles throw away energy every time you press the brakes: the rubber blocks press against the insides of the wheels and turn your kinetic energy to heat.
How could we make better brakes?
Let's try to imagine designing a better braking system for a bicycle by thinking about the
science. When we're riding along, our bodies and bikes have
kinetic energy (the energy that all moving objects have);
when we brake to a stop, all
that kinetic energy has to disappear. When we start up again, we need
more kinetic energy. An ideal braking system would involve temporarily putting
our kinetic energy to one side without throwing it away forever (as we do
when we hit conventional brakes)—a way of storing the energy so we can get it
back again in the future.
How could we achieve this? If you're a cyclist, one easy but rather impractical way would be
to carry a gigantic ramp around on your back. Each time you wanted to stop, you could throw the
ramp down on the road up ahead of you so you'd bicycle up it and
gradually come to a halt, some distance in the air. As you went up
the ramp, it would be like going up a hill: your kinetic energy would be rapidly
converted into potential energy and you'd slow down and stop. When
you were ready to start off again, you'd simply roll down the other side of
the ramp and you'd get back (most of) your original energy (the stored
potential energy would be converted back to kinetic energy, just as it is
when you bicycle down a hill).
Artwork: Regenerative braking by using a ramp to store kinetic energy as potential energy.
Okay, this is a little bit bonkers—so what else could we do? If your bicycle has a
(a small electricity generator) on it for powering the lights, you'll
know it's harder to pedal when the dynamo is engaged than when it's
switched off. That's because some of your pedalling energy is being
"stolen" by the dynamo and turned into electrical energy in the
lights. If you're going along at speed and you suddenly stop pedalling
and turn on the dynamo, it'll bring you to a stop more
quickly than you would normally, for the same reason: it's stealing your kinetic
energy. Now imagine a bicycle with a dynamo that's 100 times bigger
and more powerful. In theory, it could bring your bike to a halt
relatively quickly by converting your kinetic energy into
electricity, which you could store in a battery and use again later.
And that's the basic idea behind regenerative brakes!
How do different vehicles use regenerative brakes?
Different vehicles use regenerative braking in different ways.
Electric cars and trains
In electric and hybrid cars, the regenerative
brakes charge the main battery pack, effectively extending the
vehicle's range between charges. Electric trains, which
are powered by overhead or trackside powerlines, work in a slightly
different way. Instead of sending braking energy into batteries, they
return it to the powerline. A typical modern electric train can save
around 15–20 percent of its energy using regenerative brakes in this
way. Some vehicles use banks of supercapacitors for
storing energy instead of batteries.
Artwork: How much energy do regenerative brakes save? It depends on the vehicle. Large and heavy vehicles that move quickly (such as electric trains) build up lots of kinetic energy, so they get the best savings. Although they weigh less and go more slowly, delivery trucks that stop and start a lot can also make big savings. Cars vary in what they can save from about 8–15 percent (depending on the car and whether it's driving in city traffic or the open highway). Electric bicycles are light and go fairly slowly, so regenerative brakes achieve little. Data: I've used typical mid-range figures from
various sources for trains (https://goo.gl/J3hZXL), trucks (https://goo.gl/6DRvY5), cars (https://goo.gl/UglXby), and bicycles (https://goo.gl/N0w7X3)—but you might well find different values elsewhere.
Most electric bicycles do not have regenerative
braking and gain little or no benefit from using it. Why? A bicycle is a low-mass, low-speed vehicle, so it
wastes much less kinetic energy in stopping and starting than a car
or a train (a high-mass, high-speed vehicle). Not only that, but
cyclists quickly learn to be smarter in the way they stop and start.
Most cyclists use energy really efficiently by coasting or freewheeling to a standstill
instead of jamming hard on the brakes, whenever they can. Unless you're doing an
awful lot of stopping and starting and cycling at relatively high speeds (if you're a delivery worker, for
example), the energy you save with regenerative brakes on an electric
bicycle is going to be minimal.
Indeed, regenerative brakes on bicycles can actually end up using more
energy than they save. To work effectively, vehicles with
regenerative braking systems need to have their electric motors
(typically hub motors on electric bicycles)
permanently engaged and working as either motors or generators the whole time.
That's fine for an electric car, but an electric bicycle needs its
motor on only part of the time: some of the time you can happily coast along.
Having the motor engaged all the time means the bicycle can end up using much more energy
overall, so regenerative brakes can actually end up using more energy than they save!
Often, regenerative brakes are added to electric bicycles purely as a
Photo: Electric bicycles generally don't have regenerative brakes:
unless you do lots of stopping and starting, you can't save enough energy to make them worthwhile.
You might not think of elevators as electric vehicles,
but they certainly are! Otis, a leading maker, introduced the first regenerative
elevator, ReGen™ [PDF], in 2011, claiming to save up to
75 percent of the energy normally used. Where an ordinary elevator wastes
braking energy as heat, ReGen feeds it back into the building's power system.
Other types of energy-saving brakes
Regenerative brakes may seem very hi-tech, but the idea of having "energy-saving
reservoirs" in machines is nothing new. Engines have been using
energy-storing devices called flywheels virtually since they were
The basic idea is that the rotating part of the engine
incorporates a wheel with a very heavy metal rim, and this drives whatever
machine or device the engine is connected to. It takes much more time
to get a flywheel-engine turning but, once it's up to speed, the
flywheel stores a huge amount of rotational energy. A heavy spinning flywheel
is a bit like a truck going at speed: it has huge momentum so it
takes a great deal of stopping and changing its speed takes a lot of effort.
That may sound like a drawback, but it's actually very useful. If an engine (maybe a
steam engine powered by cylinders) supplies power erratically, the
flywheel compensates, absorbing extra power and making up for
temporary lulls, so the machine or equipment it's connected
to is driven more smoothly.
Photo: Right: The heavy metal flywheel attached to this engine helps to
keep it running at a steady speed. Note that most of the heavy metal mass of the flywheel
is concentrated around its rim. That gives it what's called a high moment of inertia: it
takes a lot of energy both to make it spin fast and slow down. This machine is an exhibit in the
engine hall at Think Tank science museum in Birmingham, England.
It's easy to see how a flywheel could be used for regenerative braking. In
something like a bus or a truck, you could have a heavy flywheel that could
be engaged or disengaged from the transmission at different times.
You could engage the flywheel every time you want to brake so it soaked
up some of your kinetic energy and brought you to a halt. Next time
you started off, you'd use the flywheel to return the energy and get you moving again,
before disengaging it during normal driving.
The main drawback of using flywheels in moving vehicles is, of course, their extra weight.
They save you energy by storing power you'd otherwise squander in brakes, but
they also cost you energy because you have to carry
them around all the time.
Advanced transmissions that incorporate hi-tech flywheels are now being used as regenerative
systems in such things as formula-1 cars, where they're typically referred to as kinetic energy recovery systems (KERS).
Photo: Left: A magnetic flywheel developed by NASA for space applications. Note, once again,
how most of the mass is concentrated around the rim to achieve a high moment of inertia. Photo by courtesy of NASA Glenn Research Center (NASA-GRC).
Hydraulic fluids and compressed gas
Other kinds of regenerative systems store energy by compressing a gas each time a
vehicle brakes—a bit like the way a gas spring in
an office chair stores energy when you sit on it. The energy can be released and
reused by letting the gas expand (in much the same way as an office
chair releases energy when you take your weight off it with the
seat-lift lever unlocked). Other systems (including Ford's Hydraulic
Power Assist or HPA) store braking energy by pumping hydraulic fluid
into a reservoir.
Who invented regenerative brakes?
Now it might sound incredibly cutting-edge for electric cars and trains
to have regenerative brakes, but a little bit of research proves otherwise. The oldest US patent
for a regenerative electric train I can find, US Patent 714,196: Regenerative system by Martin Kubierschky of Berlin, Germany, was granted in 1902,
and aimed to save a very optimistic 40 percent of the usual power consumption.
There may well have been earlier versions, but not that many: regenerative technology seems to date from
around the turn of the 20th century. The first regenerative brake on a car is believed to have been developed by Frenchman M.A. Darracq and demonstrated at the Salon du Cycle Show in Paris in 1897.
Just like a modern regenerative system, it fed braking energy back to the battery
to extend the car's driving range (which was a mere 48km or 30 miles), but claimed a very surprising 30 percent saving in energy (about three times as much as the modern equivalent).
What's the point?
However they work, all regenerative braking systems have one thing in common—they help us
use energy more wisely. In a world where fuel is becoming ever more
costly, and environmental concerns are mounting
by the day, that can only be a good thing!